• moonpiedumplings@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Then it’s still a bad idea because of the literal cost to taxpayers.

    Life in prison is $70,000 per year (paid by taxpayers, of course).

    The legal battle around the death penalty is around $1.12 million, also paid around taxpayers

    https://www.cato.org/blog/financial-implications-death-penalty

    That’s 14 times more expensive.

    There are tons of things I would see the state spend money on rather than literally killing people. In the case of this, maybe mental health help for the victims.

    • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Well one way to lower it is to settle law around the death penalty it seems. And they attribute part of the cost to battling chemical manufacturers, which could be moot with how cheap and easy it is to acquire nitrogen or even carbon monoxide.

      Also if it’s 70,000 a year to house an inmate… if an inmate is jailed for 20 years before death, total cost is 1.4 million. If an inmate is jailed at 20 and lives for another 60 years, that’s 4.2 million.

      So taking out a very young inmate would theoretically save the state about 3 million if they live until a natural age. Ted Kaczynski lived until 81 and absolutely deserved death.