- cross-posted to:
- longreads@sh.itjust.works
- cross-posted to:
- longreads@sh.itjust.works
You must log in or # to comment.
Title:
There are no psychopaths, but the idea persists.
Article:
Psychopathy may not exist at all.
Laughed more at Rasmus’s “gaslight idea”
The DSM doesn’t include that specific diagnosis any more right, it’s all the ASPD and DPD spectrum now ?
They removed it because of the absolute shitshow that was trying to reliably diagnose psychopathy as it was originally described.(and possibly the negative connotations associated with the word itself)
So now they have a series of metrics to measure things they can somewhat reliably measure over time.
Like how the medical diagnosis of idiot doesn’t exist anymore, but there are more accurate and nuanced terms and diagnosis for intellectual disabilities in various forms.
I could be wrong however, my understanding of this area of research is middling at best.
There are no idiots, but the idea persists
Pyschopaty never existed as a diagnostic.
It’s akin to a doctor diagnosing you with “sick”. It is nonspecific, arbitrary and useless to inform treatment or prognosis. It was used as a descriptor by very early psychiatry, but it was never a distinct diagnosis.
We just think there are because so many people act like psychopaths
I thought we had long decided that a psychopath was a sociopath with extra steps.
As with most things like this it’s probably a spectrum rather than something you either are or are not. It’s easy to tell when someone is in the far end of that spectrum but the line where it officially crosses into psychopathy is always going to be arbitrary.
It is a laymans term for someone without a conscience whose actions usually result in hurting people.
It describes a wild range of behavior from something like your ex acting like a “psychopath” to a murderer. For this reason it isn’t useful in a legal or medical sense.
There are no psychopaths, only Zuul
That was … mildly interesting.
