• sab@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Oh, everyone who ever travels by train in Europe will tell you that the German infrastructure is very much broken. You’re lucky if your delay is less than a day travelling through Germany.

    • Litron3000@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well I live in germany and therefore use the train network on short and long distance frequently and while it is unreliable, “a day” of delay is something I have never experienced.
      Most of the delayed trains are late by less than one hour (still atrocious, but not a day’s worth by any means).
      I actually experienced only once a situation where we were given the choice of a hotel or a continuation of our travels by taxi (which we chose) because the train we were in was late one hour or something and the other (last for the day) train could not wait.

      • sab@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well, it’s based on experiences travelling through Germany proper - for example Denmark to France or Italy, including transfers. Often the delay will just be a couple of hours, but then you miss your transfer and you’re screwed.

        Also if you’re on your way to Switzerland the Swiss have no patience for disruptions in their services, so if a train is delayed coming from Germany they’re likely to just not accept it into the country at all.

        I have also heard from people who were told to spend the night in the train, which DB just parked in the outskirts of the city for the night. That way they could offer passengers a place to sleep in the cheapest possible ways. Pregnant women or families with young children were asked to check in to hotels.

      • Deceptichum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Germany doesn’t really seem like a very efficient country, they still use fax for things and every person has to manage like 10,000 different insurances for everything. Seems like an old (and inaccurate) ww2 trope.

        • esserstein@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          It’s mostly a misunderstanding of what is valued in German society. The common trope is that German society covets precision. This is not the case. German society covets unwavering precision in the adherence to norms. To the point where innovation is akin to revolution in the negative sense, and pigheadedness in procedure is considered a workplace virtue. In the mean time nothing gets done. Source: expat in Germany.

              • puppy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Migrant implies the non permanent kind because a permanent migrant is referred to as an “immigrant”.

                What’s the technical difference between a migrant and an expat?

            • Skelectus@suppo.fi
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I believe the difference is that an expat moved there non-permanently, while an immigrant moved there permanently

              Though if I ever somehow became an expat, I wouldn’t use the word because of how people associate it.

              • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                What you call an expat is a temporary immigrant. “Expats” fill immigration forms in their country of migration, not expatriation forms. Politicians pass laws that govern immigration, not expatriation.

                That word is meant to differentiate rich (and white, often) workers from the poor, because “immigrant” has a negative connotation. That’s why I take issue with it.

                The truth is, the poor might be temporary migrants too (cf Pakistanis in Dubai). The media still uses the word migrants for those. We don’t know if they’re “expats” or not, we just assume because they’re not rich or white enough.

                Quick disclaimer here: I’m not saying you are racist for using the word. I just wanted to explain why I react so strongly when I hear it.

              • puppy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Immigrant = Someone who has moved to another country permanently. Migrant = Someone who has moved to another country temporarily.

                Expat is often used by western migrants who don’t like the word “migrant”.

                I take issue with it because people classify an Indian doctor moved to the US as a migrant but an American doctor eho has moved to Europe is an expat.

              • freebee@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                No it’s just about moneymaking and education level. If you’re a foreigner and highly educated and get a good paying job like IT consultant or doctor, you’re an expat. If you’re low educated and get a low paying job like construction or factory or no job, you’re a migrant. One is liked more than the other, hence the difference they make. The first doesn’t speak local language, but does speak English, and few people care. The second doesn’t speak local language and no English and is disliked for it.How long you stay is not very relevant. AfD doesn’t hare expats as much as other migrants, for example…

        • sab@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I have no doubt their bureaucrats perform world-class efficiency in their handing out, filling in, faxing and archiving a sophisticated system of paper forms.

          I guess it’s the trap of getting complacent and stopping modernizing as soon as you’ve convinced yourself you have the best system in the world.

          • tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s more that the bureaucracy is so complex and fragmented that it’s incredibly hard to digitalize. Lots of small fiefdoms that are entitled to make IT purchasing decisions themselves means paper is the only universal interchange format. In addition there is an unwillingness to change how things have always been done, or to simplify procedures. So there you have it: The German bureaucracy is too fat to move.

            • 0xD@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I work for german government agencies from time to time and they are working on it… It’s just really slow because there is so much of it, and due to organizational overhead. Also, there is not a single push for the entirety of Germany, but some things everyone does for themselves.