• alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Google “Search Liaison” Danny Sullivan confirmed the feature removal in an X post, saying the feature “was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn’t depend on a page loading. These days, things have greatly improved. So, it was decided to retire it.”

    okay but… has it? this seems like an unfounded premise, intuitively speaking

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10 months ago

      “What excuse could we use for this cost-cutting measure?”

      “Uh, we could just say that people don’t need it anymore.”

      “Johnson, get that man a promotion!”

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yea I’ve been using it more and more recently, although part of that is sites like Twitter or Reddit randomly hiding content

    • ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Bingo. When I read that part of the article, I felt insulted. People see the web getting increasingly enshitified and less accessible. The increased need for cached pages has justified the existence of 12ft.io.

      ~40% of my web access is now dependant on archive.org and 12ft.io.

      So yes, Google is obviously bullshitting. Clearly there is a real reason for nixing cached pages and Google is concealing that reason.