behold: the my little pony episode about marxism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLBfhmp66D0&t=3s

if marxism starts with an armed revolt and ends with centralized control in the hands of one person (the party secretary or whatever), is marxism fascism? maybe theyre an enlightened despot- what about the revolt? maybe the revolt was done with votes. ok what about the central control- what about calling everyone who wasnt marxist the enemy? isnt fascism: when a strongman-type leader comes to power then makes all decisions, while and by calling other people the enemies and turning everyone against them? or, is this pattern similar to all changes of politics- theres always people leading the charge, yelling that the other ways are worse? is there a subtle difference though between calling other platforms wrong and asking for a democrat vote and shared power, versus calling other people enemies, asking for or taking total control, and then using the system to beat up political enemies? what exactly are you going to do with all the capitalists if your marxist minority successfully seizes power and then realizes that none of the capitalist citizens want to cooperate? seeing as the basis of your system is a belief that all currency is inherently evil (currency is an inanimate object by the way), can you enlighten me then? what is evil about currency? if you were a farmer trying to sell vegetables from your farm to a city, how would you distribute them yourself to enough different street corners and buyers to successfully sell them all before they wilt, soften, or rot, while carrying around the non-currency goods that you bartered your vegetables for all day? the only point of currency was to solve this problem: so that the farmer could just sell all the vegetables to different vegetable sellers, many at a time, so that those sellers can take their amount to their different vegetable stands on different corners and then sell those to different crowds in the city- anyone would be unlikely to find a place where they could sit on one corner and sell all the vegetables- people dont buy that many; they just buy a few at a time. theres a mark up in price each time, because, each person is doing additional work that adds to the system. if you wanted to achieve the same effect, but without currency, i believe you could work that out, and you dont need anyone enslaved or forced, you just need everyone excited about socialism or communism and you need a competent system worked out for it. it can be done. thats not what im debating with you. what im debating with you is only that: there was nothing wrong with, or evil about, the first system described, which uses currency. did i miss something? or did the marxists? do you know how appealing its been in every age to tell poor people that rich people are evil? its one of the most popular sentiments. can you understand how thats an appealing, popular sentiment at all times, without it being necessarily true? what if someone wrote a series of books though to capitalize on this fact, only to enrich themselves and amuse lower and middle class readers? first of all, arent they a capitalist for just trying to make money selling populist themed books of sentiment? did marx make no money? he certainly lived in a capitalism- did he barter with people for vegetables? how did they keep the vegetables from rotting? to clarify my position: i see capitalism and marxism as equally practicable; i just dont think theres an increase of morals with marxism.