He ran 5k twice as fast as me in my best times, and then accelerated over the next 37km!
Hey, but if you had his shoes, he’d only have run a 5k 1.9x as fast as your best times!
Dude is fast and second place too.
But sawe looked ready to do it again.
Imagine breaking the world record and coming in 3rd.
How does that happen? Wouldnt the 1st place person get the world record since they won??
How can the winner of the race have a worse time than someone who didnt get first place/win the race?
The first three runners were all faster than the previous world record.
So the third place finisher broke the previous world record, but the other two in front of him broke it even harder.But how could he have made history if the other front runners already smashed that? This seems a little weird phrasing
You’re taking this a little too literally. The point is you run a sub 2 marathon and only don’t get the record because someone broke the record literally 20 something seconds before you reached the line. That’s gotta hurt somehow


