• Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    According to Mr. Bean’s original article, that’s the average length of car ownership in Britain due to the prevalence of three year leases.

    And it doesn’t matter if they’re going on the used market because there’s still another new car getting built that doesn’t have to be.

    • sdoorex@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Except that is ignoring the filtering effect of the used market. As a car ages and changes hands, it is likely to replace an older, less efficient car. How else could we replace the oldest cars that are going out of service due to being at the end of their life?

      It’s not like the people that are buying old used cars are suddenly going to afford an expensive new car. Instead, they need an affordable used car.

      • bassad@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Are we sure newer cars are more efficient ? With dieselgate and recent articles about how Co2 emissions are better in lab but same on real conditions, we are allowed to have fat doubts.

    • racemaniac@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, the policy causes more cars to be sold, which is also an important thing to take into account.

      But you initially said “If most people replace their cars every three years they’re not getting to 80,000 km before they buy a new one.”, and that is plain wrong, the car is not scrapped after those 3 years, so when it changes owner for the first time is irrelevant. And that 80k km is worst case scenario, that assuming all electricity is generated in the least environmental way possible, in practice it’s often <40k km that there is already a break even because not all electricity is generated by coal.