• Kedly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Bud, just because some people using it as a red flag are racist, doesnt mean ALL people who are… are. Theres no denying that racist people care more about this red flag than the others, which all arent the same degree of red flag I might add. I’m merely pointing out that theres non racist reasons to be wary of a race swap

    • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Which doesn’t seem like a very helpful point. We all have figured out it’s a mixed bag. The more interesting question might be what’s the mix? Just because a handful of them are using race swap as a lazy filter for what they presume to be bland media we gotta handle the rest with kid gloves just in case?

      • Kedly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Thats what I mean, though. I cant really think of a race swap, that wasnt a fully new character, that added to a story. For me, its a good sign, so far, because if theres ever an era that could change that its right now, that its likely a soulless corporate move, that the piece of entertainment is probably going to waste my time. The mix currently isnt in favour of race swaps. That being said, if the ONLY problem I hear about the piece of media is a race swap, I’m likely still going to watch it. It usually just signals me to wait a bit, and then other more important info, like none of the characters being likable and Scooby Doo not even being IN the newest Scooby Doo, will quickly come out and let me know that it isnt worth watching

        • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          So you are one of the handful. The fine point that you are trying to make is lost when it follows up people saying that changing an established character’s race is purely pandering. The idea that most readers distinguish the superhero mantle from the alter ego doesn’t hold up. When they say established character they mean Spider-Man. You might not but again you are the tiny handful.

          So if changing race is a lazy inconsequential element why is it an issue? Why not all the other lazy inconsequential changes?

          Why is inclusivity the inevitable obvious outcome of focus groups?

          • Kedly@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’d argue that there are more like me than you think, we’re just hidden by how loud the racists are (And others who arent as stupid as me as to get painted like one to argue about a relatively minor point). I guess I should reiterate that race changing in itself isnt a problem, its moreso that in its current most often usecase its signals that bad writing will follow. I’m making great care to point out entirely new characters because THERE where its a moniker that a new character adopts, there is plenty of precedent that it results in a new and interesting spin. But race swaps without character changes havent done so and have usually been done to hide bland writing

            • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’m still not sold that race swapping is any real indicator of bad writing. I think there are fewer like you than there are those who are coming from a racist motivation, whether they realize it or not. You taking care to make the distinction of new characters as you define them, and it’s a good take on what constitutes a new character, doesn’t change what most people mean. If you’re going to use such similar language to convey your take it’s kind of on you to make the distinction clear whenever you bring it up.

              • Kedly@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                I think we’ve both explained our points and theres not much further to say, but I do want to point out that Miles Morales is very clearly NOT Peter Parker, Its not a thin line I’m arguing on on that point. They are both Spider Man, but they are different characters. That being said, I think we’ve reached the point where we understand each other but disagree, so I dont have much further to say if you dont as well.

                • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I dunno, I didn’t get much that was tangible about how race swap was a sign of bad writing. While I agree that Miles and Peter are different a great many don’t agree and insist that race swapping spider-man was lazy and pandering.

                  • Kedly@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Its less so the concept, and moreso the consistent execution. Kind of like theoretically a live action version of anime wasnt impossible to do in a good way, but until recently, all attempts to do so in the past were hilariously bad. And the fact that you cant seperate the racist talking points from the non racist ones is why I see a race swap without just creating a new character as a red flag. Studios have noticed if the shoehorn a social issue in that they can hide their bad writing behind the racist and sexists who’ll get angry just because a person of colour or a woman took the main role.