I’d like to be a fly on the wall when Hannibal Barca, Alexander the Great, Genghis Kahn, and Bai Qi discussed war and empire building.

  • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 minutes ago

    Emma Goldman, Karl Marx, Kondiaronk, and Frida Kahlo.

    Emma ist a pragmatic anarchist, Karl has the theory, Kondiaronk is funny and used to pick apart Europeans’ bullshit, and Frida has the artistic angle in addition to knowing politics.

  • PugJesus@piefed.socialM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 minutes ago

    Caesar, Napoleon, Garibaldi, and Ataturk.

    I would love to hear these four discuss ambition, compromise, risk-taking, and philosophies of governance.

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 minutes ago

      Thousands of years of patriarchy means there are more dudes, both in-power and remembered, who are major figures. The selection pool, unfortunately, is not equal by the biases of historical societies and the records they left behind.

  • hakase@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago
    1. Gṛtsamāda (author, or family of authors, of the oldest book in the Rg Veda)

    2. King Minos (or any real Minoan); Vercingetorix (or Celtillus) otherwise

    3. Enmebaragesi (first confirmed historical Sumerian king)

    4. Hattusili I (first historical King of the Hittites)

    (5.) Queen Himiko, King Tang of Shang, or King Menes (early or first confirmed historical rulers of Japan, China, and Egypt)

    • rosco385OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I like the way you’re thinking, but IMO Socrates would be an absolute nightnare. Maybe swap in Euclid?

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        nah, go full bore and choose Diogenes

        EDIT : Great, now I want the trolliest combinations. Surely a pair would be Newton, Diogenes, but who would compliment these two to exasperate the shitstorm further?

        EDIT 2 : I guess one would be “choose a sex positive feminist”

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Babbage/Lovelace, Turing, Al Kwarzemi, Dennis Richie.

    Damn, only four makes the setup difficult. I also had Grace Hopper and Konrad Zuse on the shortlist. Just the WW2 contributors would be another combo that would be amazing.

    • rosco385OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Damn, only four makes the setup difficult.

      Tell me about it! Charlemagne, Zhuge Liang, and Julius Ceasar were on ny shortlist.

  • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Which 4 historical figures would you want to have dinner with?

    My four grandparents, the last of which died 25 years ago.

    But, hey, sure, resurrect Genghis Kahn, what could possibly go wrong…? ;-)

    • rosco385OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah, but what could your grandparents have taught me about how to crush my enemies, so I can see them driven before me, and hear the lamentations of their women?