Tighter policies in schools reflect the ‘narrowed’ tolerance towards Tibet from the Chinese state

A new report by Human Rights Watch argues that the compulsory use of Chinese as the primary language in schools in Tibet raises “serious concerns under international human rights law”.

  • Riverside@reddthat.comEnglish
    14·
    3 hours ago

    “Colonizer ass question” is when you want to know the opinion of the locals instead of falling for US propaganda, sure buddy

    • deftEnglish
      3·
      3 hours ago

      Lmfao yes the conflict between Tibet and China is because of the US.

      Boogeyman ass propaganda loser

      • Riverside@reddthat.comEnglish
        13·
        3 hours ago

        Oh my fucking god HAHAHAHAH I just realized you’re talking about Taiwan. You can’t even tell the name of the fucking country and you believe you know better than anyone HAHAHAHHAHAHA

        • deftEnglish
          3·
          3 hours ago

          Nope. Nowhere in there is that suggested. Are you on crack?

          • Riverside@reddthat.comEnglish
            14·
            3 hours ago

            Then why are you saying it’s its own country? Tibet Autonomous Region is literally a subdivision of China, there are essentially no countries denying this?

      • Riverside@reddthat.comEnglish
        14·
        3 hours ago

        There is no conflict between Tibet and China, you fucking uneducated twat, Tibet is an Autonomous Region within China.

        • deftEnglish
          2·
          3 hours ago

          Why is a certain someone in exile then? Why are we talking about this?

          Because there is a conflict. Are you that fucking stupid? Lol

          • Riverside@reddthat.comEnglish
            13·
            3 hours ago

            Total votes in the last elections to the Tibetan Government in Exile: 60k. Surely those represent the plurality of the MILLIONS of Tibetans in Tibet huh?

          • Riverside@reddthat.comEnglish
            13·
            3 hours ago

            Also, from Wikipedia:

            The Central Tibetan Authority is not recognised as a sovereign government by any country

            You are literally making shit up brother

            • deftEnglish
              2·
              3 hours ago

              You are like going through something personal right now or I’m triggering your handlers and they’ve got a gun to your head. Blink twice if you need help

              I didn’t say any of that. The simple fact that this conversation exists is evident of a conflict. Nobody is talking about the Amish fighting for independence, no conflict. There is talk of various indigenous tribes from Lenape to Hawaiian independence, some conflict. There is talk of Puerto Rico becoming a state or not, some conflict.

              All those places are more part of the US than Tibet is part of China. The conflict there is fucking massive by comparison especially considering the fact YOU’RE SITTING HERE ARGUING ABOUT IT.

              Even you are aware of Tibetan desire to be autonomous and not Chinese or a vassal for China.

              Now sit down and stop freaking the fuck out

              • Riverside@reddthat.comEnglish
                11·
                2 hours ago

                You are an extremely propagandized individual, beyond saving, if you believe a 70+ year long exiled monarchy is representative of the Tibetan population. You don’t deserve the air you breathe.

          • Riverside@reddthat.comEnglish
            13·
            3 hours ago

            Why are we talking about this?

            Because you’re an uneducated twat who believes the so-called “Tibet government in exile” has any modicum of representation of Tibetans, instead of the reality of it being a royal family kicked out of their country by a socialist revolution and being angry about it. Imagine if the family of Marie Antoinette had a French Government in Exile, would you take it seriously? This is literally what you do.