I made a post on hierarchy a month ago but I have some more specific questions now.
I’ve been hit with the claim that mass production industries that are needed today would not be possible without a hierarchy. That due to regional limitations and the logistics of smartphone manufacturing, technology cannot be produced on the needed scale without a hierarchy of managers.
This is quoted in PCB fabrication, as well as other areas such as medicine and other mass produced goods.
It is also said that managers are needed for efficiency, though I don’t understand that.
Because the anarchist movement, abolishing hierarchy, “runs counter” to the “global direction of humanity and progress”, it is acclaimed to being “doomed to failure” and “idealist”.
What would be the anarchist response to this? Would appreciate detailed responses and/or resources.
I want to improve my anarchist understanding
I’m not defending them I’m just saying you can’t really talk shit to them in this instance while the war was ongoing and not since without mentioning the global libs yes they do tend to be backstabby I’m well aware
… I can talk all the shit I want.
‘Allies’ who backstab you and try to kill you after they appoint themselves as the leaders of the movement that you started in your own country… are not great allies.
They’re not I wouldn’t choose them at least they showed up and brought guns it might not have been worth it but it was something the libs agreed nobody but the fascists was allowed to do that feels worse