• PP_GIRL_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    The Civil War didn’t begin over slavery but the South seceded over slavery. It’s complex but yeah Lincoln was originally ambivalent towards abolition in 1861.

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ambivalent isn’t correct. Lincoln wanted to end slavery, but wasn’t willing to risk the country being split in two over it.

      • PP_GIRL_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Lincoln’s personal beliefs =/= the agenda of his administration. Lincoln originally campaigned against full abolition because he knew it would split the Union. It’s nuanced.

    • blady_blah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      The civil war absolutely begin over slavery. What do you think started it if not for slavery? The south succeeded over slavery issues. The south fired on Fort Sumter because they succeeded. It all stemmed from the political fight over slavery.

      • PP_GIRL_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Did you read my comment at all? The Civil War started over slavery 100%, but the Union didn’t go to war to abolish slavery, they wanted to preserve the Union

        • IDe@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Your comment reads

          The Civil War didn’t begin over slavery