The ruling marks the first time in UK legal history that protesters convicted of criminal damage face a ‘terrorism connection’ upon sentencing
If peaceful protest is going to carry the same sentence as violent terrorism, what’s the point of trying to be peaceful?
What the fuck.
What the fuck?
What the fuck.
Terrorism: “the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims:”
Make it make sense because I’m not seeing how this is terrorism.
The actual terrorists, the bourgeois class, are obliged to explain the widespread sensation of terror, but do not want in every case to be identified as its source. Most of the time they would try to stick it on migrants or trans people, but in this case they can do one better: pin it on the activists who have correctly identified the source of terror, and try to crush them into silence.
I’m rich and would rather the word mean something else entirely. Hey, now it does and I get to lock up people who disagree with things that benefit me. The law is only as good as those wielding it.
Full house cleaning needed in UK, US, Aus and some parts of Canada. The rot and corruption cannot stand.
That slope sure is slippery
As deliberately decided.
deleted by creator
We know which side of the class war that guy is on.
The terrorist and authoritarians.
This is how effective zionist lobbies are. They probably gut that judge by the walls. He is the one who should be charged with terrorism as decisions like these strike fear into people who would like to join peaceful protests.
Scandalous
Add another nail to the so called pretentious “western values” coffin.
Slip slip slip down the slppe
