Yes i am, because it is unimportant if the light comes from the sun or the moon or a 3km large satellite (assuming they would have the same radiance). It would be important if the power plant were ten times larger, the satellite would be closer or larger. However in this case the limit to the power is is the etendue of the light at the satellite. The maximum power is the etendue at the satellite times radiant flux of the sun.
If you want a fun and interesting read which does explain a related “problem”, there is a relevant xkcd
I could explain it to you in at least five different ways in detail, three of them i have already done in short here in the comments. However, you never argued directly against my point. You don’t talk to me seriosly but laugh about it.
This is not what a serious disussion looks like
like. If you want an explaination, i would be motiviated to take the time and explain it in detail.
Note that i listened to your point, considered it and argued why it plays no role. You have not considered my explainations.
I’m laughing since you’re ignoring a key detail, the arc minute is massively different at 500km (your calculation) vs 147 million km.
If you want to be taken seriously, don’t make shit up lmfao.
Why am I going to consider your incorrect math? Please explain that? Lmfao your math is just wrong, you can try and explain it, but no one is going to listen since it’s just plain wrong dude. You have to account for all relevant details including the difference of the arc minute at 500km vs 147 million.
At the distance we are from the sun the rays are essentially parallel, your calculations don’t account for this, it’s not 3km.
And sometimes you just need to laugh at someone so they can realize that they actually don’t have a clue, lmfao that’s here. Thanks for the laugh mate.
Yes i am, because it is unimportant if the light comes from the sun or the moon or a 3km large satellite (assuming they would have the same radiance). It would be important if the power plant were ten times larger, the satellite would be closer or larger. However in this case the limit to the power is is the etendue of the light at the satellite. The maximum power is the etendue at the satellite times radiant flux of the sun.
If you want a fun and interesting read which does explain a related “problem”, there is a relevant xkcd
I could explain it to you in at least five different ways in detail, three of them i have already done in short here in the comments. However, you never argued directly against my point. You don’t talk to me seriosly but laugh about it.
This is not what a serious disussion looks like like. If you want an explaination, i would be motiviated to take the time and explain it in detail.
Note that i listened to your point, considered it and argued why it plays no role. You have not considered my explainations.
I’m laughing since you’re ignoring a key detail, the arc minute is massively different at 500km (your calculation) vs 147 million km.
If you want to be taken seriously, don’t make shit up lmfao.
Why am I going to consider your incorrect math? Please explain that? Lmfao your math is just wrong, you can try and explain it, but no one is going to listen since it’s just plain wrong dude. You have to account for all relevant details including the difference of the arc minute at 500km vs 147 million.
At the distance we are from the sun the rays are essentially parallel, your calculations don’t account for this, it’s not 3km.
And sometimes you just need to laugh at someone so they can realize that they actually don’t have a clue, lmfao that’s here. Thanks for the laugh mate.