“VATICAN CITY, June 23 (Reuters) - The Vatican on Tuesday reaffirmed a long-standing rule that only an ordained priest or ​deacon can give a sermon at a Catholic mass, ‌rejecting a request from German bishops to broaden the practice and allow sermons by women or other laypeople.”

  • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The new testament isn’t in parables at all. Some of the characters in the new testament use parables, but that’s not the same. And if the bible is parables, nothing in it is meant to be taken in any way literally which clearly isn’t the case. You’re taking contradictory positions. And nothing about the passage implies anything about light or physics whatsoever.

    • root
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      MOST of it is in parables, the parts about Jesus and his life are personal testimonies of the disciples

      • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Or not: https://factually.co/fact-checks/religion/gospels-where-written-by-whom-88e1e4

        Contemporary historians and biblical scholars tend to treat the canonical Gospels as works produced in specific first‑century Christian contexts rather than straightforward eyewitness memoirs: many scholars judge the Gospels anonymous, composed in Greek for communities across the Roman Empire, with Mark likely written first and serving as a source for Matthew and Luke (the Synoptic Problem), while John’s Gospel is notably different in style and theology.

        Are the gospels even considered part of the catholic canon?

        • root
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          they are different in styles because they are different people

          Yes, they are

          • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            they are different in styles because they are different people Yes, they are

            That does not answer these discrepancies:

            Contemporary historians and biblical scholars tend to treat the canonical Gospels as works produced in specific first‑century Christian contexts rather than straightforward eyewitness memoirs: many scholars judge the Gospels anonymous, composed in Greek for communities across the Roman Empire, with Mark likely written first and serving as a source for Matthew and Luke (the Synoptic Problem), while John’s Gospel is notably different in style and theology.

            They were written miles and years apart from each other.