I guess this is probably going to be the new shitty norm with bait and switch for reviews then nickel and dime afterwards.

  • B0NK3RS@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    9 months ago

    Adding micro transactions after release is bullshit. There should be rules where it needs to be in from release or not.

    • Bone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Right. Some people wouldn’t bother with a game at all if they knew there would be this. It’s very deceptive.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Knowing they were charging for new characters was almost a dealbreaker for me. This would have stopped me if I had known.

        • Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Paying extra for characters IS a deal breaker for me in fighting games. It’s literally pay to win.

          That said, I’ve been playing Tekken since ps1, so I’ll probably just pirate this whenever it’s available.

      • Chozo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        9 months ago

        Some people wouldn’t bother with a game at all if they knew there would be this.

        Perhaps if this was unusual for the genre. But it’s a AAA fighting game. Anybody who is familiar with the genre knows that MTX is normal and expected, because it’s going to have several years of support from the developers. I’d have a hard time believing that any Tekken fan bought this on the premise of it remaining MTX-free.

          • Chozo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            9 months ago

            Doesn’t it, though? This is what the players wanted, and the industry listened. They asked for support for the game after its release, and the industry said “Sure, but in exchange at least some of you should pay extra”.

            This isn’t forced upon anybody. Just because Mazaratis exist doesn’t mean that you have to buy one if you want a car. It only becomes a moral problem if somebody’s choices are circumvented, but that’s not really what’s happening here.

            • Jomega@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Doesn’t it, though?

              It used to normal to beat your kids. It was wrong then and it’s wrong now.

              This is what the players wanted, and the industry listened.

              The reason we are having this conversation in the first place is because people didn’t want it.

              This isn’t forced upon anybody.

              They added it the game post-launch, after reviews had already come out. Anyone morally opposed to micro transactions (which as I’ll get to in next point, have a very good reason to be opposed to on principle) who had bought the game has been tricked into supporting a business practice they despise. This is incredibly scummy and should rightfully be seen as a dick move.

              It only becomes a moral problem if somebody’s choices are circumvented, but that’s not really what’s happening here.

              Micro transactions as a concept are strategically designed to exploit people with addictive personalities. This is not a theory on my part, this is legitimately what the intent behind them is. But don’t take my word for it, here’s a video discussing that very thing.

        • yamanii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          There’s a pretty big difference between new gameplay (characters) and cosmetics that were clearly removed to be sold.

    • caut_R@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      9 months ago

      Wait until the reviews are out so people can‘t be warned, and the product can’t be dunked on and then…

      • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        9 months ago

        Exactly. If they’d announced this before launch, it would’ve been the only thing anyone talked about. There would have been a huge backlash and I’m sure a good percentage of the community would’ve dumped the series there and then.

        This is doubly scummy. Glad I didn’t buy it yet.

        • Chozo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          If they’d announced this before launch, it would’ve been the only thing anyone talked about.

          Not really. It’d hardly have been mentioned, at all. MTX are a part of every major fighting game, so it’s hardly a newsworthy tidbit. They’re completely expected in this genre. Any major competitive game that gets developer support after release is going to be funded either by microtransactions or subscriptions. The people who actually play these games know this.

    • okamiueru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      If they place something behind MTs, then I completely agree. But, if they want to add more cosmetics that don’t exist yet, and they finance it MTs, and at a fair price, it’s less unethical.

      Announcing it after reviews… Hm. Sketchy at best.

      • Ilflish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        If you tried the customisation, it feels extremely bare bones in comparison to Tekken 7. So I wouldn’t be surprised if stuff was removed to add to the Store.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      TF2?

      but tbf that basically invented the lootbox which then made TF2 free to play

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        TF2 was a better experience before it went free-to-play. I want a barrier that keeps the hordes of clueless children out.

        • B0NK3RS@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          TF2 before F2P was one of, if not the, best multiplayer games. It just wasn’t the same after that and good community servers died out.

    • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Adding shit to a game with a patch, post purchase, doesn’t require you to partake. While I hate MTX as much as anyone, you aren’t required to buy anything. Sure, this is enshittification, but you can avoid that buy buying games that aren’t “always online”.