Gerald@discuss.tchncs.de to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · il y a 2 joursAd-free streaming is a luxury nowwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square46linkfedilinkarrow-up1205arrow-down13 cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtelevision@piefed.socialtelevision@lemmit.online
arrow-up1202arrow-down1external-linkAd-free streaming is a luxury nowwww.theverge.comGerald@discuss.tchncs.de to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · il y a 2 joursmessage-square46linkfedilink cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtelevision@piefed.socialtelevision@lemmit.online
minus-squareEntertainmeonly (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·il y a 19 heuresWhat’s that like $200 a month in subscriptions? Sounds like cable all over again.
minus-squareskankhunt42@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·il y a 15 heuresThey have the ads. All we need now is a bundle that will let us choose which services/channels we sub to.
minus-squaredelmain@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·il y a 10 heuresMan, I wonder if they could just all get together and let me pay one cost to get access to all of that. It’s capitalism though, so it would probably have to be a different company that organized them all, right? Then they’d need to like… negotiate prices and stuff, right? I wonder if anyone will ever try it.
What’s that like $200 a month in subscriptions? Sounds like cable all over again.
They have the ads. All we need now is a bundle that will let us choose which services/channels we sub to.
Man, I wonder if they could just all get together and let me pay one cost to get access to all of that.
It’s capitalism though, so it would probably have to be a different company that organized them all, right?
Then they’d need to like… negotiate prices and stuff, right?
I wonder if anyone will ever try it.