• trackball_fetish
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    These mofos watched the failure that was google glass and went for it anyway lol

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I am kind of into the idea of having a little screen on the peripheral of my glasses for a heads up display as an interface with my phone. Or even as a full screen mirror for my phone to be able to browse lemmy or watch video while still keeping an eye on my surrounding. I really can’t imagine why they decided they also needed to have it record everyone secretly.

      • trackball_fetish
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The google glass design was pretty cool, sans camera. Iirc people were modifying them I think? Wonder how hard it would be to remove the camera. Probably soldered directly to the board. You could always try to make your own with some form of transparent screen

  • MrKoyun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    GOOD!!! FUCK THESE GLASSES

    These should literally exclusively be an aid device for the visually impaired and nothing more.

  • oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I kinda think that’s hilarious and how everyone that bought these go broke. Maybe at least someone will finally learn something then.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Oh you thought we’d only demand hundreds of bucks for this trash? naw, now you need to pay a subscription fee. Now pay up loser.

  • grumpy_cat@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Jeeezus. Who uses these products? They are cumbersome to begin with, and so much worse with enshittification

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      So far as i can tell, people who make PoV content, everything from YouTube shop vendors to porn

      • 123@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        They seemed reasonable for people that like fishing and the like (ignoring the huge privacy issues).

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    24 hours ago

    This bait-and-switch bullshit has gone way too far and I hope the few dozen socialists that get elected this fall really wreck this shit for the billionaires and force regulation.

  • benjirenji@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    Good headline. Didn’t call them “owners”. Because this doesn’t happen to something you own.

    Article’s first sentence already fails though.

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Usually one would wait til their product take over the market before enshitifying it. For this one, they don’t even have a feasible market. Who am I to judge tho.

  • CTDummy@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    I was always a fan of Ray Ban and got their glasses/sunglasses. Guess I need to look elsewhere since this god awful partnership.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 day ago

      Personally i avoid visible branding, and at that point you can just go with whatever frame you like. Investing in high quality lenses is much better spent money in my experience, lightweight+deglared+extra thin lenses make a world of difference for comfortable wearing over longer time for me.

      • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        Apparently when you get Ray Ban frames for prescription glasses, you can pay extra to have the Ray Ban logo engraved on them. So if you see someone with prescription glasses with the Ray Ban logo, you can lose a little more respect for them.

    • 13igTyme@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      I used to like Ray Bans, too. Then Luxotica bought them and they’ve never got any on my money since. I buy exclusively from Costco because they only sell non-Luxotica brand glasses for significantly cheaper.

      Prescription sunglasses look identical to aviators, at a fraction of the price.

        • 13igTyme@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Why? Smart glasses are stupid and no one should be buying them. They are a scam and another form of constant surveillance and recording. Only now with more accurate face recognition. All hail the future police state.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Might I suggest Persol?

      Sadly, they are expensive, but they look good and have great quallity in my experience.

      As for glasses, five years ago, I got my first Lindberg glasses, and I am never going back to other brands.

      I am currently on my third pair of black Lindberg Aaron and my current sunnies are a pair of gunmetal Persol PO1027S with custom brown lenses.

      I have all of my pervious Lindberg frames and will start reusing them next time, as for the Persol, I lost my earlier pair of an earlier model of Persol sunglasses, but I plan on getting new models or a new pair of the same model to have some spares or variation.