• eatmyass [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They’re dogwhistles. The parts about “the obese milkin welfare” and “taxes not ought to pay for your bags of fudge rounds.” Literally just Reagan era welfare queen rhetoric. If you don’t recognize those as racist dogwhistles you’ve been living under a rock for at least 40 years.

      But even if you don’t see the dogwhistles I hope you can understand how the song is punching down on poor people

        • eatmyass [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hahahaha so then don’t act like you don’t understand how it’s racist. The racism is what you like about it!

            • eatmyass [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              27
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Lol…absolutely amazing. “He didn’t literally say he hates Black people so how could it be racist?”

              Do you understand what a dogwhistle is? And I now see the Isle of Man flag so maybe you’re not American, and I don’t know how common this sort of thing is in other countries-but this is literally just Reagan era welfare queen rhetoric. It’s an extremely common stereotype that depicts Black women as lazy non-contributing members of society that rely on public welfare and the tax money of “real hardworking [white] Americans” to support themselves.

              Go anywhere in the USA in the past 40 years and bring up welfare and you will undoubtedly get people who buy into this stereotype. Hell there are people in this thread who still buy into this. And yeah of course they aren’t explicitly racist because that’s looked down upon these days, but that’s always the subtext, that was the subtext 40 years ago and that’s the subtext today: “Why should I, a white person, have any of my money go to any Black person.”

          • Takatakatakatakatak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            He’s literally singing about being part of a downtrodden underclass, but you and your juvenile half-formed political ideology make it all seem so simple. White skin = oppressor, right?

            • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              26
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              He’s literally singing about being part of a downtrodden underclass,

              He’s literally stealing valor to pander to poor people, and a specific subset given the “welfare queen” rhetoric.

            • eatmyass [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              1 year ago

              He’s not part of any downtrodden underclass, and he’s singing extremely basic and uncreative lyrics that make gestures towards working class issues while barely touching on any of those issues, all the while making sure to punch down on the “wrong” poor people. It’s petit bourgeois attitudes wrapped in redneck aesthetics made for comfortable middle class folk who feel “downtrodden” because taxes exist, welfare exists, and there are people who are richer than them. There is no solidarity with the actual working class. There are only aesthetic gestures made towards the working class so these middle class folk can delude themselves into believing they’re the salt of the earth and the backbone of the USA.