dantheclamman@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agoAlabama Supreme Court Cites the Bible in Terrifying Embryo Rulingnewrepublic.comexternal-linkmessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1477arrow-down14
arrow-up1473arrow-down1external-linkAlabama Supreme Court Cites the Bible in Terrifying Embryo Rulingnewrepublic.comdantheclamman@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square78fedilink
minus-squaredantheclamman@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up29·edit-24 months agoApparently in Georgia, a fetus in utero can count for a small tax credit. But generally, these psychos are not actually interested in the embryos themselves, merely in the concept as it relates to controlling the reproductive lives of other people
minus-squareNougat@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up18·4 months agoIf the “small tax credit” is in any way different from a regular dependent deduction, then a fetus in utero is not the same as a child ex utero.
minus-squaredantheclamman@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 months agoYeah, I’m not clear on whether it’s the same deduction or not. Either way, it’s surreal that we are actually discussing this as a real life scenario.
Apparently in Georgia, a fetus in utero can count for a small tax credit. But generally, these psychos are not actually interested in the embryos themselves, merely in the concept as it relates to controlling the reproductive lives of other people
If the “small tax credit” is in any way different from a regular dependent deduction, then a fetus in utero is not the same as a child ex utero.
Yeah, I’m not clear on whether it’s the same deduction or not. Either way, it’s surreal that we are actually discussing this as a real life scenario.