I hope this doesn’t mean they are on the slippery slope of selling user data, thoughts?

  • PLAVAT🧿S@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I had to drop Plex when it made me sign in for a locally hosted setup. I’d rather not have them in my library.

    Replaced with Jellyfin as others here have, found every device in the house so far works with it and it streamed 4k to the TV from an RPI 4.

    • Dran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      That is only true when you use their “home” feature. It puts the entire thing behind oauth because it has to do so in order to restrict libraries/content to non-full users. Think about the instance where you have a thirteen-year-old kid and you want to restrict them to pg13 and under. Without forcing oauth on local connections they could just sign out and watch all your star trek porn parodies or whatever you don’t want them to see. If you remove the server from a “plex home”, it disables the oauth workflow for local connections as expected.

      Don’t get me wrong, I’m not really happy with a lot of their new sharing/social features, and their recommendations on the homepage can fuck right off, but I do think it’s important to be accurate when criticizing. Requiring oauth on local vlans when plex home is enabled is the objectively correct solution.