• Laticauda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m no expert but it seems to me like it’s basically the kind of thing that is only technically legal only because nobody has been stupid enough to push their luck. If someone did try to do this they’d likely still be challenged legally in order to set a precedent, so I’m guessing it’s not like Biden could do something like this and get away with it scott free.

    • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m no expert but it seems to me like it’s basically the kind of thing that is only technically legal only because nobody has been stupid enough to push their luck.

      That has been the Trump administration (and post-presidency) playbook since 2016, and it has worked out remarkably well for them (and shown how flimsy many of our laws are). I say send it and let the chips fall where they may. If the courts end up deciding “yeah, that’s illegal” it’s not like they can get the shells back, unless they want to remove them piece by piece from exploded Russian equipment and Russian soldiers. They just won’t be able to use that tactic again. It’s not blatantly illegal now.

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        And setting precedent might just be good so that the law is that much stronger. Those shells might end up somewhere else someday if this opportunity is not taken.

      • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The fact that it’s part of the Trump administration playbook indicates that perhaps it is not a great way to run a country and isn’t something that should be emulated.