I got my shit handed to me because I said someone is mentally challenged. But apparently where I work that is considered hate speech. Is there a place where I can read the new terms? Like do we call all people from South America something or is it like Spanish American or Mexican American and so forth?

  • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think its better to just bypass all of that unless you actually know where they are from and just say, dark skinned fellow. Light skinned woman. There is nothing wrong with using a descriptor.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Given the history of racism and colorism in the US, reducing a person of color to just their skin color can sometimes cause upset. Using a non-skin-tone related descriptor is generally safer, if possible.

      • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure I get that. I’m thinking just in a situation where I am describing a stranger. Like “hey front desk person, a dark skinned man with a blue hat dropped his keys but I didnt see what room he went in. I have to leave so I’m leaving them with you”

        • Bismyth@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m probably being overly semantic but perhaps saying “A person with a blue hat and dark skin” would be the least abrasive way of putting it? That said, obsessing over endless semantic refinement and searching for a flawless alternative that does not exist for fear of hypothetical offense will lead to recursive over-correction ad nauseam