it makes sense yeah but most of the space savings is from keeping one frame and then saving the next several frames as a series of just deltas. plus there’s stuff you notice when it’s moving but not so much when it’s still. between that and the jpeg-xl benchmarks i’m comfortable speculating that there’s probably maybe something to the idea of having separate lossy image and video codecs.
you’re right but even then i kinda think there are different things to optimize for. i found a benchmark i edited into my original post but honestly who the hell knows
it makes sense yeah but most of the space savings is from keeping one frame and then saving the next several frames as a series of just deltas. plus there’s stuff you notice when it’s moving but not so much when it’s still. between that and the jpeg-xl benchmarks i’m comfortable speculating that there’s probably maybe something to the idea of having separate lossy image and video codecs.
You are still storing a key frame every couple of seconds or so
you’re right but even then i kinda think there are different things to optimize for. i found a benchmark i edited into my original post but honestly who the hell knows
To me it’s honestly a lot of
And the results in data compression aren’t different enough to use anything with less wide software support.