• SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    A single repair or modification would ruin the entire automation process. One single screw off by a single mm type thing.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Why the flying fuck do you think I said, “non-general AI”? Even a well written algorithm could handle things coming in not in perfect shape, yet everyone pretends “non-general AI” means, “execute instructions repeatedly without any input what so ever.”

      Use your brain. Even basic dumb algorithms that can run on an Arduino can respond to input. Machine learning can easily respond to dynamic input, so stop failing to imagine the most basic of basic things I say.

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That doesn’t exist yet, and we can’t even build a ship with one. And you’re trying to say we can take one apart?

        Use your fucking brain lmfao. It will be thrown off by bent metal, it will be thrown off by repairs, it will be thrown off by a rusted screw, it will be thrown off by a million other potential issues.

        It ain’t ever gonna work for a billion reasons, you aren’t smarter than other people mate lmfao. You’re dumber for claiming it will even be possible lol. Nice take though.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Non-general AI does already exist, at least as far as disassembling something with a blueprint is concerned. If it’s already a trash heap, just scrap it the old fashioned way, you fucking numpty.

          You assume it will be thrown off because you are too stupid to imagine something you don’t understand. There is literally NO reason to assume it’d be dumber than current tech.

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            But nothing would ever be identical to a blueprint because of repairs and modifications man…… add in wear and tear, yeah it ain’t happening.

            That’s the part you can’t understand. We don’t have anything that can perform this yet, if you want to claim it exists, let’s see it then.