• Nudding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Actually its the world you suggested, I’m just taking the logical next steps.

    • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m just taking the logical next steps.

      Giving smokers refunds on their NHS taxes because they die before the really expensive geriatric care kicks in, unlike greedy non-smokers?

    • cali_ash
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      No, it was very much you that suggested that healthcare priority should be based on the evaluation of someone’s lifestyle choices.

      • Nudding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Good. It’s not the governments place to ban people from making unhealty decisions when they don’t affect others.

        If they weren’t put last in priority, then their lifestyle choice wouldn’t only be affecting them, would it?

        • cali_ash
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Logically obsese people need also go to the back of the line then. Very unhealthy lifestyle, very expensive for the healthcare system. In fact, everyone that perticipates in any non-government sactioned activity, to the back of the line. We need that healthcare for our superior people!

          Ok Adolf.