Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 10 months agoTrump Says He’s Too Rich To Post Bond In Carroll Defamation Caseabovethelaw.comexternal-linkmessage-square76fedilinkarrow-up1186arrow-down111cross-posted to: antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world
arrow-up1175arrow-down1external-linkTrump Says He’s Too Rich To Post Bond In Carroll Defamation Caseabovethelaw.comRapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 10 months agomessage-square76fedilinkcross-posted to: antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down10·edit-210 months agoMy personal definition of “slut” is someone who has orgasms without guilt. Pretty sure Trump has never given another human being an orgasm (and if he did, it was an accident). Therefore, they were not sluts, at least in that particular instance.
minus-squareHandBreadedTools@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·10 months ago My personal definition of “slut” is someone who has orgasms without guilt. What the fuck
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down3·10 months agoThe word should be reclaimed. See: The Ethical Slut
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·10 months agoThe traditional definition is a sex negative one. It should be either reclaimed or expunged altogether. Which would you prefer?
minus-squareZink@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoOh either would be great, just like with many other nasty insulting words. I don’t think that will happen though.
minus-squarefine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5·10 months agoWell OK, but you understand that most people have another definition for slut right?
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·10 months agoOf course, that’s why I was clear that this is my personal definition.
minus-squareSPRUNT@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·10 months agoPersonal definition == alternative facts
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·10 months agoObviously, nobody has ever tried to reclaim a word before. Certainly not among the queer community.
My personal definition of “slut” is someone who has orgasms without guilt. Pretty sure Trump has never given another human being an orgasm (and if he did, it was an accident). Therefore, they were not sluts, at least in that particular instance.
What the fuck
The word should be reclaimed. See: The Ethical Slut
It’s OK guys he’s taking it back!
The traditional definition is a sex negative one. It should be either reclaimed or expunged altogether. Which would you prefer?
Oh either would be great, just like with many other nasty insulting words. I don’t think that will happen though.
Well OK, but you understand that most people have another definition for slut right?
Of course, that’s why I was clear that this is my personal definition.
Personal definition == alternative facts
Obviously, nobody has ever tried to reclaim a word before. Certainly not among the queer community.