• Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    China is among the most populus countries and your metric is susceptible to that.

      • Gladaed@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Real gdp growth is not a good metric of wealth. It’s a metric of progress(speed).

        It also doesn’t punish an export economy without domestic consumption, which is what I find worrying/exploitative.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          It’s a metric of progress(speed).

          I mean, that’s how you get good standards of living. You can also look up its GDP per capita, which isn’t high but is definitely respectable. In that case though you can look up China’s HDI. There’s just no metric by which China is failing the majority of its citizens (emphasis on majority; of course Uighurs for example will feel differently).

          It also doesn’t punish an export economy without domestic consumption

          That doesn’t make sense though. Exports bring in money which can be used to import stuff or for domestic consumption. A strong export economy leads to good standards of living.

          • Gladaed@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 hours ago

            That’s not correct. E.g. Germany has consistent exported way more goods and services than it has imported. A healthy economy is not an automatism from being good at shipping stuff off shore. There is no gain from building a car if you buy the materials ship the car and have money left over. You do actually have to spend that money. There is no good in owning money. That’s how economies die and cost of e.g. housing explodes.