My point it’s it could carry to a lot of psychological problems and social problems for the kids.

  • huginn@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s where the question comes into play. The set of beliefs without requirements for worship make it a philosophy rather than a religion. A religion that does not require beliefs but rather suggests practical implementations doesn’t fit the same structure as the other major world religions.

    Anyway if your beliefs require indoctrination of children to believe in myths and legends as a coercive means of control it’s fucked.

    If it does exactly as you say above: it’s not a religion it’s a philosophy, because it does not use myths and legends as coercive means of control.