• ampersandrew@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The case Nintendo was making, as I understand it, was that their site provided pretty clear links to sources where you could circumvent encryption, even though they weren’t doing it themselves.

    • HarkMahlberg@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is effectively how Kakao argued against Tachiyomi: they provided extensions to websites where pirated manga could be hosted, even if they weren’t running the sites themselves. They facilitated piracy, even if they didn’t host any pirated content.

      I have a profound respect for how RPCS3 has been able to stay above water. They police the community heavily, AND they have a list of games that are persona non grata to even talk about, let alone ask how to get them to work.

      • Uranium3006@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        AND they have a list of games that are persona non grata to even talk about, let alone ask how to get them to work.

        where’s the list?