• andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Israel sells and donates weapons as we speak. It dosn’t need any help. Their industrial capacity allows them to produce more weaponry than they use in Gaza.

  • Banzai51@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Should we? Sure. But the whole point of Russia opening up this front was to divert weapons away from Ukraine. And Republicans will make it so.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      We should also just divert republicans to an air drop in Russia.

      Since they’re so patriotically Russian, and all.

  • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Big brain idea, give the weapons to the Houthis, indigenous peoples of Canada, and random kids in SE Asia.

    We’ll be like Santa Clause.

    • kofe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      YOU GET A GUN. AND YOU GET A GUN. EVERYBODY GETS A GUUUUUUNNNN

      -Oprah

      • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I see someone got the joke. 😂

        Here’s some bombs. Don’t blow them all in one place kid.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t think we should bombing Yemen, or helping Saudi Arabia do it, but when you suggest giving guns to a group that calls for genocide in its motto you’re going to get pushback even as a “joke.”

          • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            We’re already giving guns to Israel, and arming a group calling for genocide has never bothered the US before.

            I would go far enough to say it’s the American way. Manifest destiny and 2A for everyone! 😂

            Anyway, we shouldn’t be arming anyone. Dumping lots of weapons doesn’t lead to great outcomes, and all it does is fuel violence. If not now, later.

  • pudcollar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Melt them down, liquidate the arms industry and move all their talent to aerospace.

    We could have had a Startram for that money. We could have skipped fueling a few proxy wars and gone to Mars instead.

    • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Ukraine isnt a proxy war, its Russian imperialism with an end goal of genocide.

      Stopping that is mire important than Mars.

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Then force the new aerospace talent to develop WH40K bolt guns which happen to be guns that shoot rocket powered projectiles.

    • Pilgrim@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The society that unilaterally decides it’s not interested in war gets conquered by the ones that don’t follow along. It’s an unfortunate reality, but history is full of civilizations that were largely peaceful and reaped the rewards that come with it, and were predated by other civilizations who kept the hard edge.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Si vis pacem, para bellum (If you want peace, prepare for war)

        If you aren’t ready for war, you get conquered by a war monger. If you want to be at peace, you must be ready for war against those who want to conquer.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            No, I’m saying that a nation that wants peace still needs to be ready for war, or they end up like Ukraine and are invaded. Ukraine is lucky that there are nations who supported them, because they gave up a lot of their defence for nothing. I didn’t mention any specific nation.

      • pudcollar@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Anthony Blinken said “If you’re not at the table, you’re on the menu.”. The US sure lives by the law of the jungle in international relations. Although this has been the case for centuries, this style of foreign policy really got going with WWII. Our country’s war materiel production was behind what was necessary at the time to participate in a 2-front global war. Soldiers were training with cardboard weapons, but because we hadn’t outsourced our production offshore, we created an economy based on war that was so lucrative for business that that economy has lasted to this day. Such is it that a war economy itself can conquer a nation. Eisenhower warned about this in his farewell address.

        There’s protecting a country from invasion, and then there’s basing a country’s whole economy on a continuation of arms sales. The latter provides a perverse incentive to destabilize regions in order to maintain demand for the American arms industry. In the case of defense of the US against invasion, are you honestly suggesting that the country with the highest private gun ownership rate in the world has that to fear in any scenario? Even if we did need a military at all, one that could appropriately be called a department of “defense” would be a tenth of its current size.

        • Pilgrim@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I wouldn’t suggest that the US is a happy medium for militarism, but the idea that you can melt down all the weapons and somehow maintain your peace in a world where there are characters like Putin is really dangerous.

          • pudcollar@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            The US foreign policy serves to create a demand for their arms industry. It’s counterproductive to maintaining peace. Drastic changes would need to take place for this to be a possibility. I’m in favor of those changes. The American military industrial complex is a bigger threat to Americans than Putin is. It’s certainly a bigger threat to other countries. The US has had no need to be involved in a conflict it’s been in for almost 80 years. The military has literally done us no good since Arpanet.

    • AbsentBird@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah, war is a gigantic waste of human effort and resources. I’m not sure going to mars should be our next goal either, maybe we could decarbonize our power grids or start reversing desertification first.

      Those are much larger and complex ideas though, this meme is just about changing the delivery address on the stuff that’s already being shipped.

      • pudcollar@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Bottom of the ocean. Better yet, recycling plant.

        I mention the space industry because there’s a lot of overlap between that and the defense industrial complex in engineering terms. NRO had a couple hubble-sized telescopes laying around they built and didn’t use. USAF has their own space shuttle. They’re currently planning to update all of our ICBMs. They could move other payloads to orbit. We don’t even need ICBMs, with submarine-launched missiles, even the new ones will be obsolete bulls-eyes for nukes in the midwest.

    • LSNLDN@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      WE DEMAND THAT THE WEAPONS OF WAR ARE MANUFACTURED NO MORE DEMILITARISE

      WE DEMAND THAT WE HAVE IN ITS PLACE A MEANS TO UNITE AND COLONISE SPACE

      Google that if you like awesome weird music

  • IceBerg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    8 months ago

    Love that you think Israel and Ukraine are opposite sides. Who exactly is backing Palestine? Supplying them with weapons? Iran and Russia…

    • AbsentBird@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      They are two different countries. The weapons would do a lot more good helping Ukraine repel the Russian invasion.

      • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        A single F35-L2 could completely dominate the nearest 300 kilometers of airspace uncontested. The best trained Ukrainian pilot would take, at the shortest, half a decade of practical training and years on multi-million dollar simulators to fly one. Not enough time to retake Ukraine from the pieces of Russian shit military. Meanwhile Israel have been training on F35s for the past 20 years.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Love that you seem to be defending a 60% civilian casualty rate in Gaza at the hands of the IDF.

      • Sentrovasi@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        There’s another poster here who is hinting that Russia are the good guys, and I wouldn’t be surprised if this person were hinting at that also rather than trying to say Palestinians are evil.

        I wholeheartedly disagree with that sentiment, but it’s what some of the people in this thread are saying.

  • spacedout@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    8 months ago

    Maybe, just maybe, it’s not a coincidence that we’re supporting Israel, but that we actually might be the bad guys other places as well? Just a thought, since your post is titled after the slogan of genocidal nazis and our role in the lead up to the Russian invasion https://youtu.be/LL4eNy4FCs8

    • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Thought about it. In 1939 the nazis used the same justifications to take czechoslovakia as the Russians are using today.

        • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          “You are oppressing germans, your laws punishing german speakers is enough”

          “You are trying to encircle us with defensive alliances”

          "Czechcoslovakia doesn’t have any legitimacy "

          “The rebellion in your territory is proof that your land should be ours”

          “Germans and Czechs are basically the same people anyway, it’s those of you in the west who turned them against us”

          “Without those mountains in the sudetenland how could germany protect ourselves”

          All things the nazis said about the czechs, and all things I’ve heard from russia regarding ukraine

    • AbsentBird@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Russia has killed over 30,000 civilians during their invasion. How can you justify that volume of carnage?

      I believe the Ukrainian people have a right to their land, and to defend themselves against foreign occupation.

      Russia is the aggressor, they need to stop this war and remove their military from Ukraine.

      • spacedout@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        Who is justifying it? To be clear, I’m a pacifist and against all wars. I too believe in the self sovereignty of people. One can be against the Russian invasion, and for the peace treaty that was about to be signed spring 2022 before Boris Johnson came and put a stop to it. Diplomacy over bombs I say, but our leaders see it as economical to fund a war against Russia, so that Ukrainians can fight it instead of our guys. I think that’s inhumane and unwise.

        • AbsentBird@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I am also against war. I guess I was confused when you implied the US are the bad guys in the invasion of Ukraine.

          There is only one country that can stop this war, and that’s Russia. To me that makes it pretty clear that if anyone were considered the ‘bad guys’ of the situation it would be them.

          It doesn’t help that you’re repeating a lot of ugly propaganda; “Slava Ukraini” has been a popular phrase since the Ukrainian war for independence in 1917, it’s not a Nazi expression, it predates the existence of Nazis. It’s a symbol of Ukrainian sovereignty and resistance to foreign aggression.

    • humbletightband@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      since your post is titled after the slogan of genocidal nazis

      It is. But I believe this war is stealing the slogan from them and eventually this will mean nothing.