Null User Object@programming.dev to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months ago8-hour time-restricted eating linked to a 91% higher risk of cardiovascular deathnewsroom.heart.orgexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1153arrow-down134file-textcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldhealth@lemmy.world
arrow-up1119arrow-down1external-link8-hour time-restricted eating linked to a 91% higher risk of cardiovascular deathnewsroom.heart.orgNull User Object@programming.dev to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square39fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldhealth@lemmy.world
minus-squareLmaydev@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·8 months agoDoesn’t matter if it’s peer reviewed. There isn’t enough data to establish causality. Chances are people who do those sorts of diets are already at risk. That’s the super important data points we don’t have. So even if their peers confirm the data is accurate and their analysis is accurate it doesn’t mean anything without further study.
minus-squareArtVandelay@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 months agoYep, I don’t see any way they could prove statistical significance as they could not reject the null hypothesis.
Doesn’t matter if it’s peer reviewed. There isn’t enough data to establish causality.
Chances are people who do those sorts of diets are already at risk. That’s the super important data points we don’t have.
So even if their peers confirm the data is accurate and their analysis is accurate it doesn’t mean anything without further study.
Yep, I don’t see any way they could prove statistical significance as they could not reject the null hypothesis.