• QuiteQuickQum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Interesting! Do you see more builds being built at the higher cap, thus attributing to the housing crisis? Thank you for taking my question seriously.

    @Ookami38@sh.itjust.works’s idea of having a portion be mandated for Minimum Wage rent has some teeth.

    • We see barely any building ever since the government introduced higher taxes on social housing corporations. And the nitrogen emissions are also very high due to industrialised agriculture, causing new build projects to stall (too many emissions in a certain area =/= no permit to build).

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      To be honest, what I see is that the market is frozen, and while there are a lot of different houses, almost all are occupied. I rent from a corporate landlord in a high-rise, and the law keeps them decent. That said, their occupancy is basically single digit units free out of tens of thousands in the NL. It’s bonkers.

      I guess what I’m saying is that these measures, like min wage help band-aid over the absolute worst problems, but they don’t make the market good. More building, more units, especially if built by the government to alleviate problems, would be good. If I understand correctly however, the previous few governments were all leaning neoliberal, so that did not happen.