• Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    You should really read your sources. The chart is not inflation adjusted. The report tells you the 12 month inflation adjusted figure.

    Inflation-adjusted wages and salaries increased 0.8 percent for the 12 months ending March 2024.

    Oh yeah we beat the pants off inflation! Whew baby! Oh by the way, there’s still the preceding years of wild fucking inflation to make back. As well as the decades of stagnant wages versus inflation.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I did read my sources, because when I said we beat inflation, that’s what my source says

      Decades of stagnant wages

      Good news, we had more than a decade of growing wages (the COVID spike is due to compositional effects)

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        A. You don’t know how medians work. In a set of [1,1,1,1,5,8,9,9,9] 5 is the median. But you wouldn’t say that’s representative of the average worker. You’re looking for the mode. Which would be 1 in that data set.

        B. .8 percent is not the hot news you’re looking for.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          5 is more representative than the mode, since it does show that about half make more and half made less

          1 is ignoring the rest of the data completely

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            If this was a representative sample the ones would have rebelled already. This is a teaching example.

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Not really, if the 1 is $100,000, should they feel worse than the $500,000 and above?

                • iopq@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Yes, but my point is not everyone should be equal, everyone should have enough money to live

                  Those are very different goals

                  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Did I say we should make everyone live on the exact same income?

                    For giggles though if we distributed our GDP equally it would be about 106,000 after the government budget is taken out. And that’s without accounting for not having to pay Medicaid/SSI/SSDI/etc… anymore.