• TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wrath of the righteous has less time constraints but definitely has some in there still. (People were not happy with how tight some of those were in kingmaker cuz they wanted to explore everything.)

    First large battle happens after a few days and you’re basically dragged there the night before if you weren’t there. There are things you could have explored before that change things etc.

    The best ending requires you to finish on an exact date.

    Anyways this is to say definitely play WotR it is an amazing game. Much better than kingmaker.

    • mimic_kry@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for the WotR review, I’ll definitely give it a try now. I was genuinely afraid to try it because of how time-focused Kingmaker was lol

      Oddly enough I think the concept still holds water, but perhaps for action rpgs? The strategic aspect of crpgs just didn’t mesh with timed events for me I guess

      • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it would work if designed better. (Which WotR is.) Kingmaker tried but it was also basically expected you do pretty much everything in order to be able to keep up. If you’re going to put in time constraints it’s gotta have A: choices that matter and lock people out of things and B: a much more relaxed XP curve so people don’t feel forced into doing ALL OF IT.

        WotR had a section where each thing you looted lead to more soldiers being killed, which is a great example. Most of the game isn’t that urgent at all, but does lock you into choices that actually affect the entire story which is cool.