• iAmTheTot@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Would is generally used for future events that will occur under only certain conditions.

          At least, I think that’s the pedantry that they are going for.

          • El Barto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            That is correct.

            Yes, I’m being pedantic in a way. But Trump won’t win, period. He already lost in 2020 while being a sitting president. People wised up. They won’t be complacent.

              • El Barto@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                To be honest, I’ll feel more confident when that professor, who has been predicting the winner with almost 100% accuracy, announces his predictions.

                Edit: some articles report that he said that he’ll make a definitive prediction in August.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Will and would are all but interchangeable here. Would only “feels” like it fits better because it’s a hypothetical event, but it’s a cause and effect being talked about. Well, effect and cause but the point stands.

        Edit: I’d like to point out that “will” is future tense, and “would” is past tense.

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          You’re of course right.

          It’s just that I prefer to use “would” because it sounds less… hopeful?