• TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    My favorite example is Gregor Mendel. He wasn’t a scientist. He was a monk with no degrees of any kind. But he did science—legendary science—which means he actually was a scientist.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I’d say he was a scientist - just not part of academia :)

      We have to separate science and academia, especially when we talk about the past.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Damn right…

        “This germ theory nonsense violates the academic truth of spontaneous generation and just sounds like crackpottery, now if you excuse me I need to drill into a man’s skull to balance his humors.” - Academia in the 1700’s

    • Sazruk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      To my understanding, he also very conveniently fudged a few of his experiments so that they would align with his other ones and ended up embellishing his final result, but also if he hadn’t done that he wouldn’t have discovered Mendelian genes? Not sure if that’s a win or a loss for science.