I’m not advocating (except for feeding pigeons). I’m telling things that are crimes in some locations. I really think you have reading comprehension issues.
Don’t worry, I understand. Nobody likes being prevent wrong. You’ll survive, I’m sure.
No, it’s the implications of individual terms that you have already posted. You say it is an individual right commit geneocide and mass murder. Look at your own terms that you said. It doesn’t matter the intent behind your words if that’s not what you meant. You used the terms, therefore you want the free exercise of genocide of humans and mass murder as fit.
It seems English is not your first or last language, given your comprehension and way of “speaking”.
I didn’t advocate for any of this. Those are examples of things that can be crimes in many places, and do not have ill intent or hate.
You’re not recognizing the implications of your own words and what the terms you use openly advocate for.
I’m not advocating (except for feeding pigeons). I’m telling things that are crimes in some locations. I really think you have reading comprehension issues.
Don’t worry, I understand. Nobody likes being prevent wrong. You’ll survive, I’m sure.
No, it’s the implications of individual terms that you have already posted. You say it is an individual right commit geneocide and mass murder. Look at your own terms that you said. It doesn’t matter the intent behind your words if that’s not what you meant. You used the terms, therefore you want the free exercise of genocide of humans and mass murder as fit.
What? Are you saying that to say “genocide” is to want the free exercise of genocide? To say there are unjust laws is to say they are rightful?
How can the intent and the meaning be different?
Is this a prank or are you still deflecting? I mean, talk about digging yourself into a hole. You went from slightly silly to full lunatic.
But I guess anything before admitting that a quote you heard somewhere doesn’t really hold water if you don’t understand it.