I was thinking of setting up a seedbox. Seeding will mean that the hard drive is being read from virtually non-stop. Is it fair to say that hard drives are designed for this? Or would this reduce the operational life-span of the hard drive?

For example, I was trying to find some spec in the Seagate Barracuda hard drive specifications document, but I wasn’t able to find anything specific to this (or perhaps I just missed it).

I’m not exactly sure if this is the right community to post this, so let me know if there’s a better place for it to go.

  • Kalcifer@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Spinning up and spinning down the disk technically always comes with the risk of the drive damaging because of the physical components involved

    Ideally, the seebox would maintain a 100% uptime.

    Constant writes would definitely be far harder on it

    Would there be a difference for constant reads (reading is what the seedbox would primarily be doing)?

    • eerongal@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Constant reads wouldn’t be as hard on the drive, but again, the more the mechanics inside the drive work/move, the more they will wear down. For HDDs, most failures are mechanical failures.

      That said, even with a consumer grade drive, I personally wouldn’t worry too much about it; modern drives are pretty solid in general, just make sure you backup anything important.

      If you’re really worried about it, WD’s gold line is made for constant reads/writes 24/7 and to be reliable under those conditions