Before indicting Donald Trump last year for allegedly mishandling classified documents, federal prosecutors had to decide where to bring the charges: Washington, DC, or Florida.
Ultimately, they charged the former president in Florida, a decision that has proven to be a fateful one — underscored by the vastly different approaches taken by DC judges as compared to the federal judge now presiding over the criminal case in Florida.
Those approaches became apparent in the past week as opinions were unsealed from two DC federal judges indicating how much more quickly and harshly for Trump the case might have played out had it remained in Washington.
Bradley Moss, a DC-based lawyer with extensive national security experience, said that the ruling from Howell provided Cannon a “clear road map” to consider the attorney-client privilege issues.
But Cannon hasn’t even scheduled a hearing on the topic, which the parties began arguing over in court papers in February.
“That she continues to sit on the matter is inexcusable,” Moss said.
Most reasonable people would regard a judge a defendant appointed as corrupt.
Others might suspect a judge that ruled in favor of the defendant who was unanimously overruled on appeal as unfit.
What do you think of Judge Cannon?
I think she’s calling it like she sees it. How do let a trial go forward after the prosecution has admitted to evidence tampering?