fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoX sues Calif. to avoid revealing how it makes “controversial” content decisionsarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up1186arrow-down11cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.partytechnology@lemmy.worldtwitter@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1185arrow-down1external-linkX sues Calif. to avoid revealing how it makes “controversial” content decisionsarstechnica.comfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square7fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.partytechnology@lemmy.worldtwitter@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.world
minus-square9point6@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up71arrow-down3·1 year ago If Twitter has nothing to hide, then they should have no objection to this bill. Always nice to see the “nothing to hide, nothing to worry about” wielded at a big company rather than everyday people. Also extra points for the guy for calling it Twitter too
minus-squarePrior_Industry@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up41arrow-down1·1 year agoMusk was all about the Twitter files, so why so coy now?
minus-squareDiplomjodler@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down1·1 year agoRules for thee, not for me.
minus-squaresyrooks@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·1 year agoBecause the X files was already taken
Always nice to see the “nothing to hide, nothing to worry about” wielded at a big company rather than everyday people.
Also extra points for the guy for calling it Twitter too
Musk was all about the Twitter files, so why so coy now?
Rules for thee, not for me.
Because the X files was already taken