What’s your favourite to use? Mine is Fish due to its ease of use and user friendly approach.

Bash is the pepperoni of shell tools being reliable in every field no matter what but I’ve moved to Fish as I wanted to try something different.

So what’s your shell of choice?

  • lengau@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    6 days ago

    Bash

    Not because it’s the best or even my favourite. Just because I create so many ephemeral VMs and containers that code switching isn’t worth it for me.

    • Technus@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      Seconded. Having an awesome Fish setup doesn’t help at all when you’re constantly having to shell into other machines unless you somehow keep your dotfiles synced, and that sounds like a total hassle.

      I’d rather my muscle memory be optimized for the standard setup.

      • Toribor@corndog.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I use Ansible playbooks to keep my config in sync. It’s great but there is a bit of a learning curve. Makes it easy to deploy config changes.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      Exactly, I choose the one that’s always there on every machine I access!

  • redxef@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    Bash, not because its my favourite but because it’s nearly ubiquitous. I don’t want to have to think about which shell I’m using.

  • rotopenguin@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 days ago

    Fish for an interactive shell, and I’ll often drop back to bash for writing a script. I can never remember how to do basic program flow in fish. Bash scripting is not great, but you can always find an example to remind you of how it goes.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    6 days ago

    Definitely fish. It does everything i need out of the box. To achieve the same with zsh, i needed a dozen plugins on top of a plugin manager. Here, in satisfied with just Starship as custom prompt.

    That said, i’ve been trying nushell recently. Don’t really think it’s for me, but it is pretty interesting

    • erwan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Don’t try zsh, because you won’t be able to go back to bash after that 😉

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Soft shell tacos are my favorite. Hard shell is ok but there’s nothing like a double wrapped soft taco.

    Oh and I just use bash.

  • toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Fish for interactive shell. “It depends” for scripting, but usually ends up Bash since it is the NixOS default.

  • Ferk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Bash. By default it might seem less featureful than zsh… but bash is a lot more powerful and extensible than some give it credit for. It might be more complex to set it up the way you like it, but once you do it, that configuration can be ported over wherever bash exists (ie. almost everywhere).