This is opinion. So read it as such. But consider it please.

Obviously if you read this based on the title. I assume you oppose the Tories.

But if you are wondering why labour are so keen to manage expectations. There is a reason.

Campaign funding wise the Tories are estimated to be 19m ahead of labour. But honestly at the moment they are not spending a huge amount more.

We know the Tories are skilled at election manipulation. So there is genuine fear that the Tories plan to launch a campaign within the last few days.

I.E. when there is less time and funding to ensure fact checking is effective.

They know Starmer is more publicity aware then Corbyn was. He is able to play it in a way that dose not scare traditional Conservative voters.

They also know thanks to Boris, that the courts are unable to punish them for outright lies during any political campaign. And that Rishi is prepared to lie about and accuse civil servants of lying when challenged.

As huge as polling is against the Tories. All it would take is some dramatic claim against the party or Starmer. To convince Tory traditional voters to bite their tongue and vote Tory. While convincing left wing voters not to vote or to switch to 3rd party in seats where labour are the 1st or 2nd party.

The fact we know they have a huge amount of money unspent. Makes it clear they plan to launch something nearer the end of the election. And the only advantage of leaving it so late. Is it will limit the ability of the party to effectively react. Or fact checkers to be able to prove and distribute evidence of lies.

Please be prepared for this.

    • Destide@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Don’t be a muppet all your life, mate. Dyslexia, op’s sight condition and a myriad of other conditions are not linked to intelligence but can result in poor grammar when written, especially as we’re writing internet comments and not books.

      • rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Dyslexia, op’s sight condition and a myriad of other conditions are not linked to intelligence but can result in poor grammar when written

        Stupidity can and often does, also result in poor grammar.

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          If you’re going to comment on stupidity and causation, you should be able to realise that two different things can coincidentally create the same effect. What you’re doing here is equivalent to seeing people commenting in English and assuming that they’re all from the UK because of that, when they could actually just as easily be from another English-speaking country or have learnt English as a second language. Sure, a lot of English-speakers are from the UK, but if someone then says “no actually I’m Australian” and your response is to insist that “English speakers are often from the UK”, you’re being wilfully ignorant.

          • rah@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            you should be able to realise that two different things can coincidentally create the same effect

            I stated a second, different cause in addition to the cause OP presented and yet you’re telling me there can be two different causes of the same effect. OP is the person you need to be telling. It’s OP who doesn’t seem to understand that the existence of dyslexia doesn’t impact the quality of language skills of stupid people.

            • Skua@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Why do you feel the need to keep insisting that stupidity can cause bad writing when nobody is actually arguing otherwise? What everyone is saying is “bad writing does not imply stupidity”. Those two statements are separate things.

              • rah@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                6 days ago

                nobody is actually arguing otherwise

                OP claimed that

                “Grammar and spelling … are not related to intelligence”

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Dysgraphia and Dyslexia are related to a failure within a certain section of the brain. Intelligence relates to the minds ability to take information from one domain of knowledge and apply it to others. IE the brains ability to adapt to new situations.

      Language skills are a useful tool. Not a requirement for intelligence.

      • rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        6 days ago

        Language skills are a useful tool. Not a requirement for intelligence.

        Stupid people tend to have poor language skills.