• tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    Android 12 took up 700MB RAM, leaving some space for non-sytem apps on lower end smartphones.

    Android 13 takes up easily 1.2GB, leaving almost nothing at the benefit of having a somewhat “snappier” interface

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I would consider the A-Series of Samsung “mid-range”. I know you said “lower” and “mid-range” is lower than “high-end”, but I suspect tetris11’s issue mostly applies to “low-end” phones. Something like a Motorola Moto G Play 2024

      • Dog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        You consider that a good thing… Phones shouldn’t have this much RAM.

        • pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Why would higher RAM be a bad thing? That’s like saying phones shouldn’t have more storage, faster processors, better camera, …

          Sure, they worked before that already. But isn’t technological advancement still good?