• 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    138
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s either a professional level dad joke, or holy wow, does he not know how much you make?

    That said, I’ll build anyone a website for £500, no matter how large. But that’s the base model. It’ll be a template taken from a catalog, and Hugo. My maintenance fees are only £250 per hour.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ll build anyone a website. I’ll do it for 450.

      No refunds, though. (don’t tell them this, but they won’t be very happy with the product.)

    • variants@possumpat.io
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s a pretty good racket. My friends boss saw us building ourselves a site one time when he let us use his shop on the weekend and he got intrigued.

      So as payment for letting us use the machine shop we took over his business website from some expensive marketing company that charged a ton we got him down to a domain and a basic weebly plan. We took photos of the shop and just used their shop colors for the text and slapped on all the contact info he wanted.

      Then his bookkeeper saw his site and wanted one so we did the same for her, then her son saw the site and wanted one for his friend who’s a plumber. Next thing you know we are turning down jobs because everyone and their mother wants a $500 website from us haha. It became a better business than what we borrowed the machine shop for to begin with

    • RealM__@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      2 months ago

      The irony of some dude trying to prove a point that a website doesn’t need to be bloated and burdened with all the design and fancy scripts, just for other people to incrementally built on top of that idea, one-upping each other in the process, mimicking the exact evolution of the modern bloated website as we know it.

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        From one of them:

        “You’re a fucking moron if you use default browser styles.”

        Or just change your browser settings (they shouldn’t be ugly by default).

        • sparkle@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          Cymraeg
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Honestly I hate the fact that browsers’ default CSS exists. The person doing the frontend should have to specify their “default” CSS before the website even loads. I say this as both a user and a programmer, the same website shouldn’t look different or break on different browsers unintentionally due to the browser’s CSS, and I as a developer shouldn’t have to rely on reset sheets to try to patch that.

          Everything would be better if it were swapped around, instead of picking out a reset sheet for a site you pick out a default style…

          The world would also be better if browsers rendered pugjs/slim and scss/sass and those were the default rather than html and css but I digress…

    • bisby@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      If we assume “half a day” is 4 hours, and 500 pounds. That’s 125 pounds per hour. Which isn’t the worst rate. Assuming it’s actually capped at 4 hours and we all know that if it’s your dad’s friend, this is not going to be a set and forget kind of thing. So that 4 hours quickly becomes 10. And suddenly you’re down to 50 pounds per hour. And then if it’s actually static and simple and good, you still have high odds of getting insane feedback demanding changes to make it worse. A motherfucking website would actually be the best option, but wouldn’t get you paid. At that point youre just doing it for the lols.

      But ultimately, this isn’t even about the rate or how much time this will take. this whole scenario depends heavily on the son here. Is the son unemployed and living in dad’s basement for free? Then yeah. Sorry, he should probably take any work he can get for any rate he can get. His dad gets a lot more say in how things work financially if the son is relying on him financially. But if the son is already working a full time job and living in his own house? Then no, I don’t care what the rate is. Don’t commandeer other people’s time. Don’t make deals that people haven’t agreed to. Come to me with opportunities, not demands.

    • MadBigote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      You sound like a LinkedIn influencer:

      I shat my pants; this is why this is a great opportunity to network!

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      In most industries, that’s considered a bait and switch. Decpetice conduct that can lead to fines.

      If you contact them immediately, to rectify an error, then not so much.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        What are you taking about, he didn’t bait anyone. You aren’t obligated to honor a quote from someone who isn’t in your company. If I said my son is a mechanic and he can put a new engine in your car for $50, you absolutely should not expect a $50 engine.

        • commandar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          You tell them you don’t work for $500.

          Or you tell them that you do.

          Per hour.

          But since they’re clearly such great mates with dad, you can cut them a deal.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m saying they should not get to the point that they walk in the door. If they call, correct immediately.

          It should be corrected, by Dad, prior to a call, rather than used as a sales funnel, which is the suggestion.

          Honest mistakes happen, but using an honest mistake to purposefully continue to mislead to get them in the door and then correct them is a bait and switch.

            • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              How do you get them in the door to tell them without the call? Youre advising using an error to your advantage to massage someone to be a client using a bait and switch tactic.

              It may not have been thenolan, being a genuine error, but that’s your plan to take advantage of it. If they purposely gave the wrong amount, would it be bait and switch in your view?

              Way to go on the straw man, though.

                • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I am listening to what you are saying. ok, so you did imply this is not the first contact. Just using a phrase to do so. Obviously you meant something different.

                  Walking out the door, also a phrase. Again, one that’s situational. It means they are on site. For talking on the phone, I’d say hang up. So again, implying its not the first contact.

                  Look, I also think it can be correctly handled, but your whole post makes it sound like a pushy sales narrative that is deceptive. Youre not outright calling for deception but the implication is there. I’m not the only one noticing it.

                  Maybe your choice of words is wrong, but when someone tells you who they are, listen.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s fine. It’s just 25 pages, but they want 20 unique designs since those are all primary/landing pages. All on a normal sized screen.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah but how many normal-sized screens do you want it displayed on? Everyone has one these days. That soon adds up.

  • Mikina@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean, if it’s **just ** a normal screen-sized website, that already makes it a lot easier. Not having to deal with responsiveness bullshit would make webdev a lot better experience. That is assuming “normal screen” means 1920*1080, or whatever is the median screen size.

    • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      To be fair, using flex box (which is the default in many modern framework) would make responsiveness a breeze these days.

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      It only needs to look good on whatever screen size the client’s CEO’s favorite administrative director uses, when she checks on it, on a Friday evening, seven weeks after delivery (but still well before I’ll ever see my $500.00…)

      Wish me luck guessing the screen size…

  • DecentM@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well he did just say designing, so lucky there. I’ll send over some wireframes, sure

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    My dad does this, and I made a few bucks thanks to WordPress. Really, more thanks to Elementor because you can make a pretty snazzy website for cheap and the layman has no it took 2 hours to put together with templates. Lol