• APassenger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m not directly addressing the image. I’m addressing the text.

    The text says there are two choices and only one is possible for any individual as their legacy of thought.

    The picture is a defining moment in time. It catalyzed change. The legacy of thought that was passed to me was mixed…

    That said, can you help me understand how the text message embedded helps move the racial conversation forward? Or how its message is at least not harmful to engaging those who need help to see the flaws in their racial mindset?

    Because once I’ve demonized people, I don’t communicate with them as well. I think that’s fairly typical, really.

    Right now the post just looks like an empty virtue signal that helps people feel righteous while also erecting bigger walls.

    • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The text references the photo. How can you ‘address it’ without addressing the photo too?

      … And then you address the photo anyways. It’s almost like you’re not even trying.

      • APassenger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m speaking to the text’s message of a dichotomy. The image is context but it is not the entirely of the message.

        • Snowclone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Well. If I take what your saying here out of all the context you included, then you’re really not making sense are you?