I am soon moving out for university and am going to meet a bunch of new folks. But I was wondering how do you go about approaching this with privacy in mind?

It is a little bit whonky to ask someone you just met to download Signal, if it is a group of people then it is more acceptable, or like how do you keep in contact if they don’t use any of the messaging platforms you use such as Signal and Telegram, and if you don’t use any of the ones they use such as Whatsapp or Instagram DMs (yes zoomers in the US use these) or Snapchat? Do you just use SMS where videos are absolute shit quality and you have no privacy there either?

Let me know how you deal with this issue.

  • angrystego@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, still the question “What are you doing with these people…” is not really relevant. OP’s responsible approach to privacy is not something that needs questioning.

    • Coreidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why not? This person is cramming security apps down the throats of new people they meet.

      Just wondering what kinds of conversations they are having with these people they hardly know that justifies needing this much privacy?

      I feel like there is a time where worrying about privacy is valid. That time isn’t with people you just met. Especially when you’re just having light hearted conversations, because you know, you just met them?

      • angrystego@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think they’re concerned that some deep secret is going to get out. They’re concerned that their communication is used for commercial purposes in a totally uncontrollable way.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      OP’s responsible approach to privacy is not something that needs questioning.

      That’s fine, but it doesn’t change the fact that it is objectively not normal.

      You can believe that it should be normal, but that’s a very different claim.

      • angrystego@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, I don’t think we’re in disagreement here. I was just trying to tie it all to the beginning of the discussion.