MeldrikMA to Facepalm · 1 month agoWhat are those signs?imagemessage-square205fedilinkarrow-up1976arrow-down133
arrow-up1943arrow-down1imageWhat are those signs?MeldrikMA to Facepalm · 1 month agomessage-square205fedilink
minus-squarehswolf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·1 month agoI get what you mean, but its adding a useless complexity layer. If the thing always is smaller than, for example, a kilogram, just use the next measurement unit, a gram. 100g, 200g, 500g, etc. It’s true the other way around, if the thing is always bigger than, for example, a kilogram, use it as is. 1kg, 1.5kg, 4kg, 6.2kg. For ease of comparison, always use the most significant unit.
I get what you mean, but its adding a useless complexity layer.
If the thing always is smaller than, for example, a kilogram, just use the next measurement unit, a gram. 100g, 200g, 500g, etc.
It’s true the other way around, if the thing is always bigger than, for example, a kilogram, use it as is. 1kg, 1.5kg, 4kg, 6.2kg.
For ease of comparison, always use the most significant unit.