What if we got to easily choose our web browser, and didn’t have to rely on complex operating system settings to change the pre-installed default?

    • Wiredfire :BA:@mas.to
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Zoboomafoo @Vincent given it’s from Mozilla I’d say there’s a very good chance the audience they had access to for the poll skewed significantly towards the Firefox-users demographic 🤔

      • Vincent@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        From the full report:

        For the experiment, two panel providers helped us recruit 12,000 survey participants across Spain, Germany, and Poland.

        So given that they used third-party providers, I don’t think they would have been biased to Firefox users specifically. (And in fact, given the current state of the market, the majority probably wasn’t a Firefox user.)

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think if you asked people, it’s one of those questions that sound good so of course they’ll say yes. In practice, they’re too lazy and can’t be bothered, and that’s where they privacy invasive and monopoly practices take over. Because in the end, path of least resistance and defaults is what determines what the majority do.

    • BubblyMango
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But then you have windows 11 where it takes about 5-10 whole minutes to get rid of all the defaults that point to Edge, and even then some things, like help pages links and the start menu’s search bar will keep openning Edge.

      You of couse have google phones where chrome and google search are shoved to each one of your home pages and to the global phone search bar.

      At that point you need to wonder - are people just being lazy, or do those companies make it just hard enough, and often impossible, to not use their pre-defined defaults?

      • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s both.

        Remember when Apple introduced the iOS update to stop cross-app-tracking?
        One popup that asks the user if they want to allow this tracking or not, and would you look at that, the majority clicked NO.

        People do care, they’re just too lazy, even if they’re aware.

      • Polar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t understand? When you launch any browser it’s a 1 click “yes” to set as default.

        To set it via Windows settings, you just search “browser” and select it from the drop down.

          • LwL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            A few days ago at work i was very annoyed and confused at outlook suddenly opening links in edge. “We are opening links in edge so you can do everything in one window” or something. Wasn’t hard to disable (though it was more than one click which already feels like too much for something actively ignoring my settings) but shows how they really are trying everything they can to get you to use edge.

        • kubica@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          And then, for example, press f1 on explorer and see it not giving a fuck about what you choose.

        • BubblyMango
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          On windows 10 its 1 click away only for Edge. For any other browser the settings page is opened and you do it feom there. Now, for me and you the settings page is the most trivial thing to operate, but for others it might not be.

          On windows 11 they have broken down the default browser to a million default settings, and you need to change each and every one individually.

          In google pixel a chrome-like search bar is stuck to every page on your homescreen, takes a full row, and very accidently clickable. You need to change the OS or launcher to stop this.

          And then some things on all of those systems will always open eith chrome/Edge with no non hackish way of changing that.

            • BubblyMango
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Same. Those companies abuse the fact they control the platform to push all of their other products. Nowadays to compete with a microsoft product in a fair way you also need to develope a popular deskrop OS, an office suite, cloud services and multiple programmong environments, because each of their products keeps pushing the other peoducts, and the platform control part simply gives them advantages only they can have.

            • Polar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s awesome, but may I ask what do you use to replace Adobe Suite? Even the next big thing, Affinity, doesn’t have Linux builds.

              I’m pretty much convinced that anyone that uses Linux either doesn’t use their computer much, or they are strictly a developer. Linux is missing way too many pieces of software, or even drivers for things, that would allow the majority of people to switch.

              Just thinking about all of the different jobs that my friends and family have, they all use some kind of software or machine that has windows/mac only drivers, that using Linux is not possible.

              • BubblyMango
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Most people use their computer solely for browsing the web and looking at images/videos, which linux is completely capable of. Next most used thing is office suites and printing - as long as you dont need to use right-to-left languages, the office suites are completely sufficient. Printers are dependent on the manufacturer, but most work, some with even less problems than on windows.

                Now when we jump to the more niche areas, it depends on the area and your needs. Programming is obviously flawless on linux. Photoshoping images should be good enough for hobbyists, but not for some proffesionals. Video editing is really good for all levels, except fpr adobe products (davinchi and KDEnlive for example). Gaming works pretty well, and is improving over time. Other niche fields have linux support/alternatives, or their products may work through wine/proton.

                At the end of the day, you can do basically anything on linux, not necessarily with the exact same tools as on windows.

                • Polar@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Each of my family/friends work in different industries. None of us can move to Linux.

                  I have a print shop, where I run wide format Roland printers and Graphtec plotters. Graphtec needs Windows/Mac, Roland needs Windows.

                  My dad is a farmer, uses a ton of farming software, all Windows-only.

                  My girlfriend is a biochemist, and the whole industry runs off Windows-only software/drivers.

                  I could go on and on, but pretty much Linux cannot be used in any of our fields. So again, I am convinced Linux users are either developers, or don’t have jobs, because it’s nearly impossible to find any industry that doesn’t require Mac or Windows.

              • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I edit videos in Shotcut and do photo manipulation with either ImageMagick or GIMP. I don’t personally do much vector art, but when I do I use Inkscape.

                For video game creation I use mostly Aseprite and Godot. I’ve got Blender installed and I’ve been meaning to learn how to use it for aeons.

                Though for my current main hustle I mainly use FreeCAD and LibreOffice.

          • Polar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I was having problems with Firefox yesterday and reinstalled it. It was 1 click on Windows 11 for me.

            • BubblyMango
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Perhaps second times are different, reinstalls are different, or they changed it. I definitely sae on a friend’s computer how many different things dedault to Edge.

              • Polar@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                What’s that mean? It worked. Go jerk off about Linux elsewhere.

                • dan@sffa.community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It will periodically overwrite user’s preference to the ones dictated by Microsoft

  • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Makes sense. If a company uses marker dominance of one product to nudge users to use another, then this should be a crime of anti-competitive behaviour. Instead, companies should be forced to offer all alternatives and not be able to highlight their own product any more than they highlight others.

  • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    This sounds like people wanting to replace edge or IE with chrome, rather than wishing they can have Firefox.

    • ChewTiger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not saying I’m a fan of Edge, but I booted up my old Surface after not using it for a few years and out of everything Edge was surprisingly one of the most responsive programs. Oddly enough it also opens up PDFs super fast. Guess that’s just a long way of me saying it’s definitely better than IE and at least a step forward.

  • ram@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So I’m just thinking about how this would work, in a perfectly non-competitive world:

    There’d need to be some Browser Standards Association to implement and suggest browsers to add to a list of “certified browsers”, with transparent requirements to be included to ensure low quality or outdated browsers aren’t included. The OS would need to implement that entire list in a randomized format. There’d preferably be some sort of built-in pros/cons list of the browser, I suppose these could be put together by a combination of the BSA and the competing browsers.
    But these pros/cons won’t be understandable or significant to 95% of people.

    The BSA would also want to ensure there’s diversity not just in browser and companies (like Opera getting 3 fucking entries), but would also want to ensure there’s a variety of browser engines (preferably not just chromium and webkit).

  • sadreality@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah but giving you choice limits companies abilities to make back room deals among each other to show shit into your face…

    Has anyone though about poor business people’s ability to control the default?

  • XbSuper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well let me be one of the 2% then (seriously who did this poll lol) Idgaf.

  • Mio@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Make the choice so it install the browser and uninstall other browsers as well. I can’t belive it is not standard with this simple choice that the user should be forced to do on any OS. EU do something about this!

  • VelociCatTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    62
    ·
    1 year ago

    Complex? You install Firefox and two seconds later it’s pestering the shit out of you to make it the default browser

    • treesquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Guess what Edge and Chrome do if you make Firefox the default browser? They all harass you if you run them when they aren’t the default. At least Firefox respects the “don’t bother me about this again” checkbox

      • MindlessZ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I think that’s exactly his point. Every browser prompts you to make it default, it’s not exactly a complex change.

    • projectmoon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think “complex” refers to the various dark patterns used by Windows and Mac/iOS to scare and/or force users that know nothing of computers into using the default browsers.

    • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the article is talking about prompting users to choose a default browser without necessarily installing them, during the OS first run for example.