- 49 Posts
- 1.61K Comments
cat && curl
top || iptables
I don’t really know this talk.
What kebab would you recommend for this lovely day? Me and my company take the best canned beer you can acquire, as well.
88·4 days agoecho “Please put an NSFW tag on this. I was on the train and when I saw this I had to start furiously masturbating. Everyone else gave me strange looks and were saying things like “what the fuck” and “call the police”. I dropped my phone and everyone around me saw this. Now there is a whole train of folks masturbating together at this. This is all your fault, you could have prevented this if you had just tagged this NSFW.”
6·4 days agoBetter?
MoViNg tO tHe sUbUrB/cOuNtRySiDe fOr tHe kIdS
A woman who saw him walking alongside the road—speed limit: 25 in some places, 35 in others—asked him if he was OK. He said yes.
Nevertheless, she called the police.
Traitor.
The plan (from child protective services) would also require Patterson to download an app onto her son’s phone allowing for his location to be monitored.
If I were the child, I’d forget my phone at home very often. A town like that probably has a no-phone school anyways.
People don’t care about children apparently. Spatial appropriation is an important aspect of childrens’ development. Children cannot lobby for themselves in the same way most adult social groups can do.
It doesn’t matter who owns the coal mine, oil refinery, LNG terminal, gas station or gas stove.
It simply has to go fast.
Billionaires are not going to solve our problems, even if we expropriate them. Marxists¹ of all people should know this.
Most ENERGY used from fossil fuels is used for energy-inefficient transportation (you know, our millions of cars), most EMISSIONS stem from power plants (likely owned by a local state body, ie our votes).
¹(ie people who heard the term class consciousness before)
4·5 days agoVergessen.
2·7 days agoI’d argue that at this point, sticking to the collective vs individual dichotomy of climate attribution and action potential is climate action delayist. When your argument relies you or your group intentionally doing absolutely nothing to combat climate change, you don’t really have climate change in mind.
Leftism sometimes cares more about class than its very foundation, the environment, to understand why there is a problem with blame-shifting.
I’ve seen this in a similar fashion in relationship advice forums: Commenters not engaging with the issue or person, but knee-jerk reacting with advising instant breakup.
I haven’t been on reddit for over a year, but I cannot imagine that topics like say atheism don’t polarise. What makes you think it is the case?
I don’t quite understand your point. Do you maybe have some examples to understand better?
Bis dahin ist zB die Westantarktis (ca. 3,3m Meeresspiegelanstieg), fast egal was wir jetzt noch groß anstellen, längst aufgetaut (wenn wir gut sind vielleicht sogar noch in den nächsten Jahrhunderten).
Ich persönlich würde gegenanstinken, aber das ist auch nicht für Alle und vielleicht sogar kontraproduktiv.
Da war n Windrad im Weg.
3·9 days agoDas sehen viele Jäger natürlich kritisch
Anthropozentrischer Unsinn, Ökosysteme sind doch keine Trophäen- oder Fleischmaschine.
Nochmal einen draufsetzen.
Die Wahlkampfmisogynie fängt früh an.